Sunday, I went to school to practice and write some jazz stuff. I tried to finish my latest chart (soon after named "Out of the Blue", but more on that later). It feels good to do work on a weekend and I felt quite accomplished (no doubt fueled by the amazing concert and meeting the night before).
Monday was much the same, spending the better part of the day at school writing and practicing (with a few hours in there for a MaxMSP intro course), only to return at 7:30pm for Live Electronics. What a total waste of time. About an hour and a half into the two hour lesson, the teacher finally decides that we should do something. So after taking more than half an hour just to set up and show him, we had to pack up and leave. What a mess. In any event, we are just about ready to start making music, someday.
Tuesday was a mix of a day if I had ever seen one. Starting with writing (for my jazz lesson that day), I went to Dok where a vocal teacher was speaking on the transition from student to professional. She had a very interesting story, spanning an early indecision, a late start in school, a near death experience that forced her to review her priorities (away from auditioning and towards being stress-free and creative), where she now directs a children's opera company, gives voice lessons, and teaches at CvA. She asked us to really review our priorities, what we really want out of life, and go for it. It related very closely to the week before, with the bass-clarinet teacher's speech, as well as this book I read a while ago called "Think and Grow Rich" by Napoleon Hill. She shared concepts of desire, visualization, subconsciousness, etc. She also turned me onto this great documentary called "the Up Series", a British documentary that followed a group of about 20 kids from age 7, every 7 years, starting in 1964. It is just so refreshing to see this kids, and basically watch them grow up and confront life. Some "do well", others totally fall out. I am on episode 4 now (age 28), so I can't say just yet how everything turns out.
After Dok was my drumset lesson. It was a little more rough that usual, with the lesson starting with a discussion about grades (I had politely articulated that I needed grades on a 4-point system, instead of a 10, and to grade gently as my financial aid can be negatively affected by grads). So this spurred a conversation on my growth, especially compared to other students at the Conservatorium. In that oh-so-Dutch way, my teacher told me flat out that he has never actually had a student as bad as me. At this school, he would have never let me in the front door. He tried to backpedal a bit talking about the differences in the systems in America and Europe, the financial situation of a state supported institution that charges all students well below cost, and how that makes competition more fierce (more or less claiming that the American system, especially at non-conservatorie schools, was a very expensive conveyer belt. I would tend to agree, especially after such a great Dok class; something that we would NEVER have in the States). Anyway, not the recipe for high self-esteem.
Totally contrary to the above, my jazz comp lesson was amazing (although I have a different definition of "amazing lesson" than most, I have found out). I brought my new piece, a sort of Weather Report ballad, to the lesson. Not much was said, just my prof playing the piece over and over again, making a few corrections to some little mistakes and such. At the end, he turns to me and expresses great excitement and enjoyment in the piece and my progress. He even went so far to say that he wanted a copy of the lead-sheet and permission to arrange it for his big-band. Um, yes? This is where I differ from most music students: I like being recognized, praised, reinforced. Most "musicians" get really exited when a teacher publicly wrecks them, giving them a huge pile to work on, and much opportunity for improvement. Not me. I just want to be good, now. Even if it's not true, it sure feels good (at least at the time) to be recognized for what you do. I think positive reinforcement is underestimated here, while negative reinforcement is underestimated in the states.
Wednesday, our trio (voice, violin, and set) met for our first live-electronics rehearsal. It must have been more than four hours long. Totally crazy. We had some good moments, in-between the ever-present technical difficulties. It is rather challenging to improvise something that doesn't just end up being "etherial gesture based slow, brooding music". But we're working on it.
Thursday was pretty routine (practicing/writing for much of the day), with Forum being my only class. This week, Bernard Lang presented for the second time. I really, really enjoyed it. Much more than last week. He talked about his most recent projects, incorporating dance that imitates the "jittering" of experimental film derived from granular analysis. His most recent work was a giant installation, in a factory, of 12 dancers on brass plates that were hooked up to player pianos. Geez, it was just massive! And it took years to create, rehearse, choreograph, build the instruments, memorize the hour+ long piece, etc. I asked Mr. Lang after the presentation, how this was possible? As a German living in Vienna, he said it was quite easy to get funding for large projects, in the form of 5 year grants from the government. With a simple proposal, you can get enough money to live for 5 years (let alone expenses, paying performers, the rehearsal space, all that) with the simple wave of a pen. Total madness; no wonder we don't have many hugely ambitious art installations like that in the States, there just isn't any money for it. That poses the question (for someone like me that fancy's themselves an economist), why is this the case? and What can we do to change it? In my opinion, I think it is a simple lack of demand. But with a lack of demand comes an eventual lack of supply, to reach equilibrium. However, it is sort of a chicken-and-the-egg argument. We need some big spending to get the stuff out there, to really show the consumer what this is, in a very Steve Jobs sort of way, telling them what they want, even though they don't know it.
Thursday night I went to the Thanksgiving dinner put on by the American Book Center. It was a nice time with pretty good food, even though it was just I and one other student there with the IES Staff. It was a little distressing seeing how many Americans there were so typical, in that they were loud and rude and had very vocal opinions founded on belief rather than fact. I literally asked the IES staff if I had to go home, because I couldn't stand being surrounded by people like that for the rest of my life.
Friday (today), I had trio rehearsal (which was pretty rough, considering we perform in like 2 weeks), and a comp lesson. At the lesson I showed my most recent composition (or at least the beginnings of it); a commission from a friend violinist for violin, djembe and dance. While I was very excited about the piece, my teacher was quick to bring my back down to earth, telling me how much more there was to do, and the shortcomings that were already present. I don't want to make excuses, but I feel like I have a pretty good concept of where the piece is going, and he has to judge me based on what I have written, which was less than a minute of music. I guess I will just have to crank and show him what I can do. Thats all there is to that.
A rather interesting side-story. Very late Wednesday night, my phone rang. I didn't answer it for the obvious reason that it was after 11pm and a blocked number. I listened to the voicemail only to find out that it was someone calling "on behalf of Jim Cramer" with a "very exciting opportunity". Naturally, I thought this was regarding my recent application to work with Jim Cramer. I mean, what else could it be? So I got out of bed and called back right away, waiting on hold for hours. Nothing. So I called back today, and got a sales person saying they knew nothing of any application but would like to offer me a discount on the premium subscription to Action Alerts Plus. I feel totally had. Totally taked advantage of. The only reason they had my cell number is because I put it on the application, and they discard it but keep my on file for cold-calling? I can't believe it. I still don't know what to think about the whole thing, outside of being very embarrassed by assuming anything. I guess that is the reality of the business; people aren't people in the banking business, they are just potential clients, potential profits. Nothing more. On one hand I kind of like that; you are judged objectively by what you make. Your numbers say it all. It doesn't matter where you went to school, what your religion is, what you drive...just what you make. If you can offer consistant returns, be it in sales or commission or trading, you're golden. Paid a king's ransom. But it IS very inhumane. Very distant from what most people believe to be fair, or just. Still much thinking to do, but this episode puts me even farther behind in my own decisions.